Advantages and Disadvantages of Technology
With the increase of violent crimes come the advantages and disadvantages of modern technology in law enforcement. Law enforcement employs the use of stun guns and is equip with car video surveillance. We will examine some of the issues that contain some validity to arguments for the continue use of these tools within law enforcement.
Stun Guns
Stun guns were implemented in law enforcement in the 1980's for the purpose of minimizing the use of firearms. There are valid arguments for both sides of the issue as to whether or not they should continue to be utilized. For the sake of this argument will concentrate on the pro side.
Since the introduction of the implementation of stun guns in law enforcement the use of deadly force had dropped to fifty-nine percent in the number of shootings by the city's police force over the past two years. (The Phoenix Police Department, Feb. 2004) Since the introduction of stun guns in 1999, many law enforcement agencies reported drops of excessive use of force by law enforcement.
While there have some opposition to the use of stun guns, the statistics in many states report that as much as seventy-eight to eighty percent of excessive deadly force was minimize as well as the number of injuries of officers. (Issues & Controversies, 2004)
Another tool that has played an important role in law enforcement is the use of video mounted cameras in patrol cars. With the use of video patrol cars, it has a dual purpose: one for the suspect and two to monitor a law enforcement officer's conduct.
A potential suspect without the use of video surveillance may claim that his rights were violated and the law enforcement...
Stun Guns
Stun guns were implemented in law enforcement in the 1980's for the purpose of minimizing the use of firearms. There are valid arguments for both sides of the issue as to whether or not they should continue to be utilized. For the sake of this argument will concentrate on the pro side.
Since the introduction of the implementation of stun guns in law enforcement the use of deadly force had dropped to fifty-nine percent in the number of shootings by the city's police force over the past two years. (The Phoenix Police Department, Feb. 2004) Since the introduction of stun guns in 1999, many law enforcement agencies reported drops of excessive use of force by law enforcement.
While there have some opposition to the use of stun guns, the statistics in many states report that as much as seventy-eight to eighty percent of excessive deadly force was minimize as well as the number of injuries of officers. (Issues & Controversies, 2004)
Another tool that has played an important role in law enforcement is the use of video mounted cameras in patrol cars. With the use of video patrol cars, it has a dual purpose: one for the suspect and two to monitor a law enforcement officer's conduct.
A potential suspect without the use of video surveillance may claim that his rights were violated and the law enforcement...
nice nice....
ReplyDeleteGood read! I am currently writing an essay on this for college and this helped. One thing I put in my essay was that if law enforcement went to military grade tablets it would Secretariat staff members. Therefore losing jobs. Hopefully having more non-field supervisors out on the road as well. All of the visits for probation and parole could be done via facetime or etc. excluding the need for home visits. Unless they have violated their probation. Im really unsure to say the least but I am getting my Bachelors of Science in Criminal Justice to go into Probation and Parole in western Kentucky and I lived in Florida for a year and dispatched in both places. Needless to say we are far behind in technology and Im assuming it it because of funding. So some places might be behind on updating.
ReplyDelete